|
Monster Cable ILS200-1M Interlink LightSpeed 200 Highest-Performance Digital Fiber-Optic Cable, Toslink-to-Toslink (1 Meter)
|
MSRP: $59.99
Your Price: $29.99
Savings: $ 30.00 ( 50% )
Shipping: N/A
Manufacturer: Monster Cable
|
|
Monster Cable ILS200-1M Interlink LightSpeed 200 Highest-Performance Digital Fiber-Optic Cable, Toslink-to-Toslink (1 Meter) Features
|
Monster designed pressure connection keeps fiber in perfect alignment with components.
Metal shell connector for lifelong durability.
Graded index optical fiber greatly reduces jitter for enhanced clarity and definition.
Spring-loaded connector keeps fiber in optical alignment for maximum data transfer.
For use with DVD, CD, DACs, S/PDIF, and Dolby Digital audio applications.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Monster Cable ILS200-1M Interlink LightSpeed 200 Highest-Performance Digital Fiber-Optic Cable, Toslink-to-Toslink (1 Meter) Information
|
Monster Cable ILS200-1M Interlink. LightSpeed® 200 1 m. fiber optic toslink-to-toslink
|
|
|
What Customers Say About Monster Cable ILS200-1M Interlink LightSpeed 200 Highest-Performance Digital Fiber-Optic Cable, Toslink-to-Toslink (1 Meter):
|
|
Like the vast majority of Monster cables, this is just over priced. There is not difference between the quality of signal of this cable and a 5 dollar cable.
purchased it about a month or two ago got here in like 4 days i think works great though and it was priced very fair
Great product, super price and fast delivery. I wish we had more product like this for resonable price.
Nothing special.good high-quality cable, works great. Ends even come protected with little condom caps to prevent scratching the end fiber.
The wavelength of light and the frequency of this noise are not related. Despite the carefully worded description of the physics of light transmission, I found the TOS to TOS ILS200-1M made a significant difference in the sound quality compared with that of the OEM cable supplied by SONY. Granted, in most consumer quality FO cables, this is a very minor component of the delivered signal; does that justify spending $40-60 more for a HQ cable. While the explanation of the physics is correct, the writer doesn't allow for variances due to execution. For example, very minor impurities in the materials that make up the body of the signal distribution unit can cause enough back flash to degrade/contaminate the signal even at the speed of light before it arrives at its destination. That's a matter of personal preference and the capability of your biological sensors. In my case I think it was worth it as a luxury.
|
|
 |
|
|
